International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | ITC Issues Affirmative Injury Determination on Ant... » | Iraq Trade Show and Conference to be Held in Baghdad » | FDA Issues Corrections to the Rule on Prior Notice... » | Bush Administration Proposes FY 2005 Budget Increa... » | China Issues Final Antidumping Determination on Ph... » | DOC Initiates Antidumping Duty Investigation on Ou... » | U.S. Hazelnut Industry Withdraws Antidumping Petit... » | Turkish Parliament Adopts Draft Law to Eliminate S... » | BIS Announces Settlement with Emcore Corporation o... » | GAO Issues Report on Illegal Textile Transshipment... » 

February 20, 2004 

BIS Issues Final Penalty Guidance in the Settlement of Administrative Enforcement Cases

The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) of the Department of Commerce issued on February 20, 2004 the final rule, Penalty Guidance in the Settlement of Administrative Enforcement Cases, which amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). The rule, which incorporates guidance on how BIS makes penalty determinations when settling enforcement cases under the EAR, states that “BIS carefully considers each settlement offer in light of facts and circumstances of the case, relevant precedent, and BIS’s objective to achieve in each case an appropriate level of penalty and deterrent effect.”

Towards that end, the rule enumerates factors BIS considers in making penalty determinations. The rule provides a number of “General Factors” considered including the degree of willfulness of the party, the destination of the export, and additional related or unrelated violations of the exporter. The rule also includes a number of mitigating factors BIS considers, including whether the party made a voluntary self-disclosure of the violation, whether the party has an effective compliance program, and whether the violation was an isolated occurrence, whether the party cooperated to an “exceptional degree” with the investigation. Finally, the rule states a number of “Aggravating Factors” such as whether the party tried to conceal the violation.

The final rule, found at 15 CFR Parts 764 and 766, is the product of the proposed rule released on September 17, 2003 and BIS’s consideration of public comments on it.

Labels:


Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger