International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" ""> <html xmlns="" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | BIS Publishes Final Rule Clarifying Export Control... » | National Summit on Cuba to be Held in Tampa » | DOC Issues Final Results of Antidumping Investigat... » | DOC Initiates AD and CVD Administrative Reviews » | Cato Institute Examines Trade Issues Facing Next P... » | CBP Publishes Technical Corrections to Customs Reg... » | Sanctions Watch Web Site Launched » | Teleglobe Faces Delisting From NASDAQ as FCPA Prob... » | DOC Requests Comments on Renewal of Steel Import M... » | DOC Issues Preliminary CVD Determination on Bottle... » 

August 31, 2004 

WTO Arbitrator Authorizes Level of Retaliatory Measures to be Imposed on U.S. for Failing to Repeal Byrd Amendment

Today a World Trade Organization (WTO) arbitration panel announced the level of retaliatory measures that Brazil, Canada, Chile, the European Communities, India, Japan, Korea, and Mexico may apply on U.S. products as a result of the U.S. failure to repeal the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000, commonly known as the Byrd Amendment.

Following a lengthy legal and economic analysis, the three-member arbitration panel stated that Brazil, Canada, Chile, the European Communities, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico were each authorized to impose additional import duties on a list of U.S.-origin products, on a yearly basis, as long as the total value of trade does not exceed, in US dollars, the amount resulting from the following equation:

Amount of disbursements under [the Byrd Amendment] for the most recent year for which data are available relating to anti-dumping or countervailing duties paid on imports from the [complaining country] at that time, as published by the United States' authorities multiplied by 0.72.

The WTO's DSB determined on January 27, 2003 that the Byrd Amendment, which provides cash payments to U.S. companies that are petitioners in antidumping and countervailing duty cases, was a non-permissible action that was contrary to several articles of the GATT 1994, the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement and the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. The DSB stated that the U.S. must implement the recommendations of the DSB within "a reasonable period of time."

On June 13, 2003, a WTO arbitrator ruled that the "reasonable period of time" for the U.S. to implement the recommendations and rulings of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) in this case was 11 months from the date of adoption of the Panel and Appellate Body Reports by the DSB. The U.S. was given until December 27, 2003 to bring the Byrd Amendment into conformity with its WTO obligations. Because the U.S. failed to modify or repeal the Byrd Amendment, on January 16, 2004 the complaining countries requested the authority to impose retaliatory tariffs greater than or equal to the amount of Byrd Amendment payments. On January 26, 2004, the U.S. advised the WTO that it objected to the level of propose retaliatory duties and the matter was referred to arbitration.

To date, the U.S. Congress has failed to modify or repeal the Byrd Amendment. In response to today's ruling, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative stated that "the United States remains committed to resolving this issue in a way that promotes the competitiveness of American workers."

The text of the arbitrator's decisions can be found at the following Web site:



Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed




  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News,".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site

Powered by Blogger