International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | U.S. Customs and Border Protection to Hold Annual ... » | OFAC Issues Cuba Educational License to Southern I... » | Senate Subcommittee Approves Measure to Waive OFAC... » | Bush Administration Rejects Section 301 Petition o... » | Commerce Department Issues Second Amended Prelimin... » | Antidumping Petition Filed on Polyvinyl Alcohol Fr... » | OFAC Imposes More Than $400,000 in Penalties for U... » | Iraq Will Soon Be Eligible For GSP Benefits » | Export Licenses for Chinese Nuclear Reactor Compon... » | Financial Times Describes U.S. Penalties Imposed b... » 

September 13, 2004 

ITC Complies With NAFTA Panel and Issues Negative Threat Determination on Softwood Lumber From Canada

The U.S. International Trade Commission on September 10, 2004 reluctantly voted to comply with the NAFTA Panel's remand instructions and issued a negative threat of injury decision in the antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) investigatins on Softwood Lumber from Canada. The decision was made after the United States-Canada Binational Panel on August 31, 2004 remanded the ITC's previous threat of injury determinations with explicit instructions directing “the Commission to make a determination consistent with the decision of this Panel that the evidence on the record does not support a finding of threat of material injury."

In its written decision, the ITC stated that "because the Commission respects and is bound by the NAFTA dispute settlement process, we issue a determination, consistent with the Panel’s decision, that the U.S. softwood lumber industry is not threatened with material injury by reason of subject imports from Canada. In so doing, we disagree with the Panel’s view that there is no substantial evidence to support a finding of threat of material injury1 and we continue to view the Panel’s decisions throughout this proceeding as overstepping its authority, violating the NAFTA, seriously departing from fundamental rules of procedure, and committing legal error."

As a result of the ITC's negative threat of injury finding, the U.S. no longer has the legal grounds to impose the AD and CVD duties on softwood lumber from Canada, currently totaling 27%. However, the AD and CVD orders are unlikely to be revoked immediately as the U.S. lumber industry may request the U.S. Government to raise an "extraordinary challenge" on the NAFTA Panel's ruling. Under the provisions of Chapter 19 of NAFTA, an extraordinary challenge proceeding is a streamlined process to consider whether a decision taken by a particular binational panel is outside the scope of the panel’s authority and poses a threat to the integrity of the panel review system. To date, no NAFTA Panel decision has ever been overturned by an extraordinary challenge.

The ITC's decision can be viewed at the following link: ftp://ftp.usitc.gov/pub/reports/opinions/fremand3opin.pdf.


Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger