International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | DOC Announces Preliminary Results of Antidumping R... » | Wilden Pump and Engineering Co. Settles Charges of... » | This Week at the U.S. International Trade Commissi... » | OFAC Issues June 2005 Penalty Report » | Directorate of Defense Trade Controls Publishes Mi... » | BIS's Director of Office of Export Enforcement to... » | BIS Publishes Notice Extending Deemed Export Comme... » | Government of Turkey Announces Privatization of Er... » | BIS to Soon Issue Formal Notice on Extension of De... » | NRC Adds Syria to List of Embargoed Destinations » 

June 09, 2005 

House Votes to Delay Implementation of Country-of-Origin Food Labeling

The U.S. House of Representatives voted on June 8, 2005 to delay for one more year implementation of a rule calling for mandatory country-of-origin labeling for meat and other food products. An amendment offered by Representative Dennis Rehberg (R-Mont.) to strike the delay provision from the fiscal year 2006 agriculture spending bill was rejected by the House by a 240-187 vote.

The country-of-origin labeling requirement, which was passed in 2002 and is now voluntary, would require meat, fruit, vegetables, fish and peanuts to originate, be raised and be processed in the United States in order to be labeled a "USA product." Congress voted in 2004 to delay enforcement of the provision and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) must begin enforcing the rule in October unless both the House and Senate vote to delay implementation again.

Cattle ranchers in the Midwest support the country-of-origin labeling requirement, saying it would help them build brand loyalty for their products. However, meat processors, retailers and some ranchers in the South say the rule would drive up the cost of beef for consumers. Many consumer groups also support the labeling requirement.

The roll call vote on the amendment can be viewed at the following link:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll231.xml.

Enjoyed a lot!
reno travel deal

Post a Comment

Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger