International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | Internet Agency Reassigns Iraq Domain » | Registration Now Open for National District Export... » | OFAC Issues Monthly Civil Penalties Report » | South African Resident Sentenced for Trafficking i... » | DaimlerChrysler FCPA Probe Reflects Trend » | BIS Imposes $101,000 Penalty on Company for Export... » | President Bush Renews Export Administration Act Fo... » | BIS Renews Temporary Denial Order » | BIS Issues Final Rule Amending EAR to Implement Au... » | There are no Signficant International Trade-Relate... » 

August 08, 2005 

BIS Announces Settlement of Antiboycott Cases

The Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) today announced the settlement of two enforcement cases involving violations of the antiboycott provisions of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR).

In the first case, National-Oilwell L.P. (NOW) of Houston, Texas, agreed to pay a $3,000 civil penalty to settle allegations that it violated the antiboycott regulations. BIS charged that, on one occasion in 2001 in connection with transactions involving the sale and ultimate transfer of goods from the United States to Syria, NOW furnished prohibited information about its business relationships with Israel in violation of the EAR. BIS also charged that NOW failed to report in a timely manner its receipt of the request from an intermediary in Croatia to provide such certification. The company voluntarily disclosed the transactions and cooperated fully with the investigation.

In the second case,
H. D. Sheldon & Company Inc. (Sheldon), a New York-based factory export representative for foodservice equipment and supplies, agreed to pay a $13,500 civil penalty to settle allegations that it violated the antiboycott regulations. BIS alleged that, on two occasions in connection with transactions involving the sale and transfer of goods from the United States to Bahrain and Qatar, Sheldon furnished prohibited information about another company's business relationships with Israel in violation of the EAR. BIS also alleged that, on five occasions, Sheldon failed to report in a timely manner its receipts of requests from Dubai to provide such certification.

best regards, nice info
» »

Post a Comment

Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger