International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | BIS Update 2005 - Day Two » | IIC's Final Oil-for-Food Report to Be Issued on Oc... » | Text of Prepared Remarks at First Day of Update 2005 » | BIS Update 2005 - Day One » | BIS's Update 2005 Begins With SNAP-R Demonstration » | House International Relations Committee to Hold He... » | Virgin Galactic Receives Export Licenses to Partic... » | Company President Sentenced in Connection With Sch... » | ITC Announces Affirmative Preliminary Injury Deter... » | Treasury Department Designates Eight North Korean ... » 

October 26, 2005 

Mandatory Country-of-Origin Labeling of Beef Products to be Delayed Until 2008

The Conference Committee considering H.R. 2744, the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration and Related Agencies fiscal year 2006 appropriations bill today agreed to delay the provision requiring mandatory country-of-origin labeling on beef, lamb, pork and other meat products until late-2008.

The meat country-of-origin labeling provision was originally included in the
Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002. In January 2004, President Bush signed Public Law 108-199 which delayed the implementation of mandatory country-of-origin for all covered commodities except wild and farm-raised fish and shellfish until September 30, 2006. Today's action will delay the mandatory country of origin labeling provision on meat until September 20, 2008.

The U.S. cattle industry and been pressing for the country-of-origin labels to help sell their beef to U.S. consumers. By contrast, the meatpacking and grocery industries have pressed for repeal of the mandatory country-of-origin labeling program and have advocated a voluntary labeling system. They claim that the costs of compliance with mandatory country-of-origin labeling will be in the billions and that such costs will lead to higher food prices. In addition, many U.S. trading partners have opposed mandatory country-of-origin labeling on grounds that it is a trade barrier disguised as a consumer protection issue.


Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger