International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | Former Manager of Canadian Shipping Company Senten... » | Iraq Suspends Dealings With Australian Wheat Exporter » | Another Japanese Company Accused of Export Control... » | Pair Charged with Attempting to Acquire and Sell D... » | Germany to File Criminal Charges Against Alleged P... » | Sanctions Can Alienate Allies » | Fallout Continues Over Expulsion of Cuban Delegati... » | CBP Publishes Quarterly Interest Rates » | Transmeta Cancels Multimillion Dollar Deal due to ... » | Profiles of Three Ivorians Facing sanctions » 

February 14, 2006 

Treasury Department Will not Reconsider Action Against Starwood Hotels

Reuters reports that the Treasury Department has no plans to reconsider OFAC's decision to require Starwood Hotels and Resorts' Sheraton Maria Isabel Hotel in Mexico City to evict 16 Cubans who were staying there for a conference earlier this month. The article quotes a Treasury Department spokesman as saying that "The law is the law, and OFAC is an enforcement agency that is statutorily required to enforce the law." "It's not a question for the secretary of the Treasury to rethink how the law is enforced -- that's not his role with respect to the activities of OFAC," he said.

The article also states that several business groups have criticized OFAC's extraterritorial enforcement of U.S. sanctions on Cuba. For example, as previously reported in International Trade Law News, USA*Engage, a coalition of business groups opposed to unilateral U.S. sanctions, has called OFAC's action a "counterproductive" move that damaged U.S. ability to push for democratic values and other foreign policy goals.

It should be noted that there has been a great deal of misunderstanding of the legal basis for OFAC's recent actions against Starwood. Many press reports have pointed to the Helms-Burton law as the basis for OFAC's actions. In fact, this case did not directly implicate The Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (Libertad) Act of 1996,
P.L. 104-114, (commonly known as the Helms-Burton Act, most of which has been waived by successive presidents) since the hotel was owned by Starwood, a U.S. company. Rather, the legal basis for OFAC's actions are the provisions of the Trading with the Enemy Act/Cuban Assets Control Regulations which prohibits financial dealings with Cubans by any person subject to U.S. jurisdiction.

Labels:


Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger