International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | Customs Increases Interest Rates on Underpayments ... » | Full Enforcement of Wood Packaging Material Import... » | ITC Announces Determinations in Steel Sunset Reviews » | USTR Announces 2006 Annual GSP Review » | BIS Imposes Nearly $1.1 Million in Penalties on U.... » | Arcelor Finally Agrees to Merge With Mittal Steel ... » | Former Titan Executive Pleads Guilty to Role in Be... » | U.S. Producers of Certain Polyester Staple Fiber F... » | Commerce Department Proposes Rule to Exempt Import... » | Saudi Ambassador to U.S. Admits Boycott of Israel ... » 

June 30, 2006 

BIS Issues Proposed Antiboycott Penalty Guidelines

In a long overdue, but welcome, development, the Bureau of Industry and Security's (BIS) Office of Antiboycott Compliance (OAC) today published in the Federal Register a proposed rule setting forth penalty guidelines for violations of the antiboycott provisions of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR)). These penalty guidelines are similar to those published by BIS's Office of Export Enforcement in February 2004 for violations of other provisions of the EAR.

The proposed antiboycott penalty guidelines set forth specific procedures for voluntary self disclosures of violations to OAC, provide guidance on how OAC will respond to violations of the antiboycott provisions, and describe how OAC will makes penalty determinations in the settlement of administrative enforcement cases related to the antiboycott provisions. As with the other penalty guidelines issued by BIS, the proposed guidelines set forth a number of general, aggravating and mitigating factors that OAC will consider when determining the appropriate penalty associated with a voluntary disclosure. For example, an effective antiboycott compliance program will be considered a mitigating factor and will be given "great weight".


Fortunately, the proposed rule states that OAC will still permit parties to submit a voluntary disclosure even if the violation has been revealed to OAC in telephone or e-mail requests for advice concerning the antiboycott regulations.

Public comments on the proposed antiboycott penalty guidelines must be submitted to BIS by August 29, 2006. A final rule will be issued after BIS reviews and considers the public comments.

Labels: ,


Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger