International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" ""> <html xmlns="" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | House Ways and Means Committee to Hold Hearing on ... » | House Foreign Affairs Subcommittees Announced » | CBP Issues Q&As on Conversion to 2007 HTS Schedule... » | Mario Mancuso Nominated as Under Secretary of Comm... » | BIS Imposes $22,000 Antiboycott Penalty on Nationa... » | Implementation of New D-Trade Software Postponed » | Bulgaria and Romania no Longer Eligible for GSP Be... » | Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Adv... » | Japan to Increase Penalties for Customs Violations... » | Report Issued on Top 10 Reasons for Changing U.S. ... » 

January 24, 2007 

Federation of American Scientists Obtains List of Unfavorable ITAR End-Use Checks

The Federation of American Scientist's (FAS) Strategic Security Blog has posted on its website a list of “unfavorable determinations” during fiscal years 2002 through 2004 resulting from end-use checks of U.S. arms exports performed under the State Department's Blue Lantern Program. Blue Lantern end-use checks are conducted by U.S. mission personnel abroad and, in some instances, DDTC personnel to verify the destination and specific end-use and end-users of U.S. commercial defense exports. FAS obtained the document pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

According to FAS:

The FOIA document - and the annual reports that it supplements - are poignant reminders of the importance of strong arms export controls, including rigorous end-use monitoring. US defense articles and services are sought by terrorists, criminals, and rogue regimes the world over, and too often the only thing that stands between them and the weapons they seek is a vigilant licensing officer. In 2004, for example, a pre-license check on a request to send pistols to violence-racked Central America revealed that the purported end-user was a front company set up by a firearms retailer under investigation for violating local gun laws. The license was denied and both countries were added to the State Department's watchlist.

The document also speaks to the importance of strong export controls on all transfers, including exports to close allies. As recently as 2004, proponents of arms export control “reform” were calling for a relaxation on controls on exports to certain countries. Congressional opponents balked at these requests, pointing out that even arms exports to America's closest allies are not exempt from end-use problems. The FOIA document supports these claims. Of the 191 unfavorable determinations identified in the document, 26 involve NATO members and 34 involve the so-called “NATO +3” countries (NATO members + Australia, Japan, and New Zealand). While the document is too vague to determine the exact nature of the problems that led to the determinations, past end-use monitoring reports provide some insight. In 2002, for example, the State Department reported that, "[a]s in previous years, the incidence of Western European-based intermediaries involved in suspicious transactions continues to be notable. In FY 2002, 26% of the 50 unfavorable checks, mostly for the export of aircraft spare parts, involved possible transshipments through allied countries. Possible transshipments through Europe as a whole accounted for 34% of the unfavorable checks."
The list of "unfavorable determinations" can be found at the following link.

Labels: ,



Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed




  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News,".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site

Powered by Blogger