International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | Next DTAG Meeting to be Held on October 21, 2008 » | Emerging Technology and Research Advisory Committe... » | BIS Releases FY 2009 Seminar Schedule » | OFAC Issues New Economic Sanctions Enforcement Gui... » | CBP Extends Deadline to Submit Comments on Propose... » | Venezuela Dropped From Kimberly Process Diamond Ce... » | Nuclear Suppliers Group Approves India Exemption » | Philadelphia Area Export Company and Employees Ind... » | Canada Imposes Economic Sanctions and Arms Embargo... » | Federal Judge Overturns Florida's Travel Act » 

September 09, 2008 

White House Threatens to Veto Defense Authorization Act Over Iran Sanctions Provisions

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) today indicated that the Bush Administration opposes the current version of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (S. 3001) that is being considered in the Senate for a variety of reasons, including the inclusion of sanctions-related provisions that "would restrict the ability of the United States to deal effectively with the threats to regional security posed by the conduct of Iran."

With respect to Iran, the Statement of Administration Action on S. 2001 states:

The Administration strongly opposes proposed Iran sanctions legislation recently reported out of both the Senate Finance and Banking Committees. Most objectionable are certain provisions in the bill reported out of the former committee that would ban completely, until conditions are fulfilled, nuclear cooperation under proposed agreements for cooperation. The Administration has firmly and consistently maintained that conforming nuclear cooperation agreements should be dealt with only in accordance with existing provisions of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act. The bills [sic] would also serve, if enacted, to divide the multilateral coalition that has come together to oppose Iran’s nuclear programs, by requiring the Administration to submit “blacklists” of foreign companies investing in Iran’s energy sector and determine whether each reported investment qualifies a sanctionable offense under the Iran Sanctions Act. The Administration continues to stress with our international partners that “business as usual” with Iran is ill-advised. As a result of our pressure and that of our international partners, several foreign firms have announced they will not be making further investments in Iran’s energy sector.

Labels:


Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger