International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" ""> <html xmlns="" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | Israel Becomes Signatory to OECD Anti-Bribery Conv... » | House Subcommittee to Hold Hearing on Export Contr... » | Commerce Department Makes Antidumping Determinatio... » | Senate Confirms Gary Locke as Secretary of Commerc... » | Irish Trading Company and Three Individuals Indict... » | 2009 Americas Annual Letter of Credit Survey Confe... » | House, Senate Launch Efforts to Change Cuba Trade ... » | OFAC Publishes Cuba Family Travel Q&As » | Senate Confirms Ron Kirk as Next USTR; Senate Hold... » | Incoterms 3000 Scheduled to be Issued in Fall 2010... » 

April 01, 2009 

For U.S. Satellite Makers, a Bid for a Bailout That Wouldn’t Cost Billions

In anticipation of tomorrow's House International Relations Subcommittee hearing on possible reforms to export controls on commercial satellites, today's New York Times contained a good article entitled "For U.S. Satellite Makers, a Bid for a Bailout That Wouldn’t Cost Billions". The article, which examines the history of and debate over export controls on commercial satellites, notes that:

Proponents of change are optimistic, pointing to a campaign pledge by President Obama and the support of respected figures like Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser to Presidents Gerald R. Ford and George Bush.

But the export revision is by no means a sure thing. The national security arguments cited in imposing the limits still resonate with conservatives who believe strict regulation is needed to keep China and other countries from stealing secret technology.

The article discusses the National Academies' "Beyond Fortress America" report on export control reforms that was issued in January of this year. The report, which was written by a committee co-chaired by Stanford University president John Hennessy and Brent Scowcroft, found that many current U.S. export controls "aimed at protecting national security, in fact weaken U.S. innovation and competitiveness in global markets, thereby reducing economic prosperity, which is an essential element of U.S. national security."

Labels: ,



Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed




  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News,".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site

Powered by Blogger