International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" ""> <html xmlns="" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | AESDirect Outage Notice and AES Downtime Policy » | Overview and Summary of DDTC Consent Agreement wit... » | House Members Form Bipartisan Working Group on Ira... » | DDTC Publishes Final Rule Requiring CJs to be Subm... » | Treasury Identifies and Designates 21 Entities Det... » | Today's News and Notes » | Interim Final Rule Intended to Clarify Purpose of ... » | House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee Holds Hearing o... » | Today's News and Notes » | ITC Issues Report on Export Barriers Encountered b... » 

August 12, 2010 

State Department's Proposed Policy Change on Foreign National Employees May Not Resolve All Concerns

The State Department's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) published a proposed rule in the August 11, 2010 Federal Register that would amend the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to modify U.S. policy regarding end-user employment of dual national and third country nationals. This policy change, which is billed as part of the President's export control efforts, if implemented would eliminate the need for end-users of defense article or controlled technical data located outside of the U.S. to obtain an export license (DSP-5) from DDTC prior to the transfer of defense articles within a foreign business entity or organization or providing access to that information to company employees with the approved destination country.

However, this license free treatment comes with several additional requirements, including employee screening for "substantive contacts" with restricted or prohibited countries listed in section 126.1 of the ITAR (such as China, Venezuela and other countries subject to U.S. sanctions), non-disclosure agreements and technology security/clearance plans.

While this policy change is intended to minimize the human rights concerns that have arisen in several countries, this proposed policy change may not be enough to overcome all of these concerns. Of particular concern will be how to screen employees "for substantive contacts with restricted or prohibited countries" without violating local law.

A summary of these issues from the Canadian perspective is provided below. This article was written by Toronto-based attorney John Boscarial, who serves as the head of McCarthy Tétrault's International Trade and Investment Law Group, and is reprinted by permission.

Proposed US Defence Control Changes Aim to Resolve Conflicts with Canadian Human Rights Law
          By John Boscariol, McCarthy Tétrault
Canadian companies dealing in aerospace and military goods and technology have long struggled with requirements under the US International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITARs) that prohibit employees of certain nationalities or born in certain proscribed countries from accessing US-controlled defence services and technology in Canada. In order to comply with these restrictions, Canadian companies have had to risk violating provincial and federal anti-discrimination laws, as well as exposure to human rights complaints, when denying employees access to projects involving US-controlled defence items because of their nationality or country of birth.

There may now be some light at the end of the tunnel for companies subject to these conflicts between Canadian and US law. Today, the US State Department released its proposal to amend the ITARs to address the conflicts with human rights policies in Canada and other countries and the administrative burden associated with compliance with these restrictions — see Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Dual Nationals and Third-Country Nationals Employed by End-Users. Comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted until September 10, 2010.

The proposal provides that no approval from the US State Department Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) will be required for the transfer of defence articles within a foreign business entity that is an approved end-user or consignee for those items, “including the transfer to dual nationals or third-country nationals who are bona fide, regular employees, directly employed by the foreign business entity.” Further, the transfer must take place completely within the territories where the end-user is located or where the consignee operates, and must be within the scope of an approved export licence, other export authorization, or licence exemption.

There are significant conditions, however, that Canadian companies will have to satisfy in order to take advantage of this exemption. They include:

1. obtaining security clearances for their employees from the Canadian government or having a process in place to screen employees and execute Non-Disclosure Agreements ensuring that the employee will not transfer any information to unauthorized parties; and
2. screening employees for substantive contacts with the prohibited or restricted countries, and establishing and maintaining a technology security/clearance plan for such screening and related record-keeping (such plan to be available to the DDTC upon request).

The proposed amendments set out those considered to be “substantive contacts” with the restricted countries, and include recent or regular travel, recent or regular contact with agents or nationals of such countries, continued allegiance to such countries, or acts otherwise indicating a risk of diversion. An employee with substantive contacts with persons from restricted countries “shall be presumed to raise a risk of diversion, unless DDTC determines otherwise.”

Canadian companies dealing with aerospace and defence products, technology or services should review these proposals carefully to assess their potential impact on current and future operations. In particular, the amendments appear to impose on Canadian companies a significant due diligence burden with regard to the gathering of information on employee activities outside of the workplace.

Even if these amendments are finalized, Canadian aerospace and defence companies will continue to face challenges in ensuring they are compliant with a patchwork of applicable US and Canadian law in this area, including the ITARs, Canadian privacy and human rights law, as well as Canadian defence controls under Canada's Defence Production Act and Export and Import Permits Act.

Labels: ,



Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed




  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News,".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site

Powered by Blogger