International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" ""> <html xmlns="" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | NCITD Now Accepting Applications for International... » | Engineer Sentenced to 32 Years in Prison for Expor... » | BIS Issues Final Rule Implementing Changes to Expo... » | Census Bureau Issues Update on Port of Unlading Re... » | When Truth is Stranger Than Fiction: California Ma... » | Texan Pleads Guilty to Exporting ITAR-Controlled W... » | OFAC Adds Additional Entities Affiliated With Iran... » | White House's Cuba Travel Announcement - What Does... » | Congress Adjourns Without Renewing GSP or Passing ... » | News and Update on Export Controls Certification R... » 

January 26, 2011 

GSP Program Remains in Limbo

Things are not looking very good right now for renewal of the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), the long-standing duty preference program that expired on December 31, 2010.

Today’s Politico contains a story providing extensive background on the political issue involving sleeping bags that delayed the Senate vote on the GSP renewal bill passed by the House during the lame-duck session. The article indicates that Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL), who has placed a hold on the extension bill, shows no signs of backing down and as a result the future of the GSP program remains in "limbo."

As we reported, the U.S. Congress adjourned on December 22, 2010 without renewing the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program, which expires on December 31, 2010, or passing the numerous miscellaneous tariff bills (MTBs) that eliminate customs duties on certain imported products.

While the Senate passed a scaled down version of the House-passed bill that included the GSP renewal (H.R. 6517) the final version of that bill which passed the Senate and was agreed to by the House did not contain the language renewing GSP or enacting the MTBs.

As a result, on January 1, 2011 U.S. importers of GSP-eligible merchandise started having to pay normal U.S. customs duties until the program is renewed by Congress.

The last time that the GSP program expired Congress renewed the program retroactively, which allowed importers to obtain refunds of any customs duties paid. However, the refund process takes time and needs to be closely monitored by the importers.

In the meantime, importers should work closely with their customs brokers to ensure that entries of GSP-eligible products are flagged with the GSP Special Program Indicator indicator (SPI) "A". Using that SPI will help facilitate any refunds when (or if) GSP is renewed retroactively.


Thanks for posting info on why this program expired. I knew that the renewal hadn't passed, but I didn't know why. It has been quite a problem for the company I work for.

You are welcome. Yes, expiration of GSP benefits has adversely impacted many U.S. companies that use products eligible for GSP treatment in their products.

Doug - thanks for keeping this a priority. The Coalition for GSP started a new blog on GSP that will highlight companies impacted by expiration at

The goal is to put up a new story every day, so if companies are willing to give us first-hand accounts, they should drop us a line.

Dan Anthony (Coalition for GSP)

Post a Comment



Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed




  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News,".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site

Powered by Blogger