International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | ITA Announces Proposal to Govern False Statement A... » | Commerce Issues Preliminary Antidumping Determinat... » | Commerce Initiates Antidumping Duty Investigations... » | ITC Votes to End Case on Kosher Chicken From Canada » | Treasury Publishes List of Boycotting Countries » | ITC Votes to Continue Antidumping Case on Wooden B... » | OFAC Issues General License Permitting Direct Eart... » | American Seafood Distributors Announce Opposition ... » | Antidumping Petition Filed on Frozen and Canned Wa... » | Commerce Department Initiates Antidumping Case on ... » 

January 26, 2004 

EU to Challenge US Practice of Zeroing Negative Dumping Margins at WTO

The European Union (EU) is preparing to file a complaint at the World Trade Organization over the United States' practice of calculating dumping margins by zeroing negative dumping margins. The practice of setting negative dumping margins to zero typically increases the dumping margin calculated by the Commerce Department.

In a case filed by India against the EU involving bed-linen from India, the WTO's Appellate Body found that the practice of zeroing was a violation of the WTO Antidumping Agreement. See European Communities -- Antidumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-Type Bed Linen from India, WT/DS/141/AB/R (Mar. 1, 2001). The EU no longer uses the zeroing method in its dumping calculations and now claims that the US practice is inconsistent with the WTO Appellate Body's decision on this issue.

Many respondents in US antidumping investigations have unsuccessfully argued that the Commerce Department's practicing of zeroing violates US and international law. However, all challenges brought against this practice have been rejected by the Commerce Department and the US Courts. Indeed, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), the highest US to render an opinion on this issue, recently affirmed the Commerce Department's practice of zeroing in The Timkin Co. v. United States, Slip. Op. 03-1098 (Fed. Cir. 2004). In Timkin, the CAFC found that "Commerce’s zeroing practice is a reasonable interpretation of the statutory language" and that "Commerce's methodology for calculating dumping margins makes practical sense." Moreover, the CAFC held that the Appellate Body's decision in Bed Linen from India was not binding.


Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger