International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | Treasury Announces Creation of Office of Terrorism... » | European Union Initiates Sanctions on U.S. Goods » | ITC Votes to Continue Case on Outboard Engines fro... » | BIS Issues Final Penalty Guidance in the Settlemen... » | ITC Issues Affirmative Injury Determination on Ant... » | Iraq Trade Show and Conference to be Held in Baghdad » | FDA Issues Corrections to the Rule on Prior Notice... » | Bush Administration Proposes FY 2005 Budget Increa... » | China Issues Final Antidumping Determination on Ph... » | DOC Initiates Antidumping Duty Investigation on Ou... » 

March 25, 2004 

U.S. Files Case Against China with the WTO

Last week, the U.S. filed a case with the World Trade Organization alleging that China has imposed a discriminatory tax rebate for integrated circuits produced in China.

U.S. exports of integrated circuits to China, which are subject to a 17% value-added tax (VAT), valued $2.02 billion in 2003. The U.S. contends that China taxes domestically produced integrated circuits at a rate which is significantly lower than the rate foreign producers pay since China offers a refund on integrated circuits that are domestically produced. Specifically, the U.S. notes that the VAT paid by Chinese producers may be as low as 3% in some cases once the allegedly discriminatory refund is assessed. The U.S. contends that this refund is inconsistent with the national treatment obligations that China assumed when it joined the WTO in December 2001.

This action is the first to be filed against China since it joined the WTO. In making the decision to bring the action, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) noted that China has made “substantial progress” in areas such as agricultural biotechnology but contended that the U.S. had repeatedly engaged China on the integrated circuit VAT without resolving the dispute over the allegedly discriminatory tax.

Under WTO dispute settlement procedures, filing the case commences a 60-day “consultation” period. If no resolution is reached within sixty days, the U.S. can request the establishment of a panel to determine whether China is acting in accordance with its WTO obligations.


Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger