International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | WTO Arbitrator Authorizes Level of Retaliatory Mea... » | BIS Publishes Final Rule Clarifying Export Control... » | National Summit on Cuba to be Held in Tampa » | DOC Issues Final Results of Antidumping Investigat... » | DOC Initiates AD and CVD Administrative Reviews » | Cato Institute Examines Trade Issues Facing Next P... » | CBP Publishes Technical Corrections to Customs Reg... » | Sanctions Watch Web Site Launched » | Teleglobe Faces Delisting From NASDAQ as FCPA Prob... » | DOC Requests Comments on Renewal of Steel Import M... » 

September 01, 2004 

BIS Announces Settlements in Two Enforcement Cases Involving Unlicensed Exports

The Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has settled two enforcement cases involving unlicensed exports to organizations included on BIS's Entity List.

In the first case, New Brunswick Scientific Co., Inc., an Edison, New Jersey-based manufacturer of laboratory equipement, agreed to pay a $51,000 civil penalty to settle charges that it exported various types of laboratory equipment and other items in violation of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). Specifically, BIS alleged that, on seven occasions between March 13, 1999, and August 24, 2001, New Brunswick Scientific exported laboratory equipment and other items to India, Taiwan, and Israel without the required export licenses. BIS also charged that New Brunswick Scientific made false statements on export control documents and, in certain instances, failed to file the requisite export control documents. At the time of the exports to India, three of the recipients of such shipments were on BIS's Entity List, and exports to those entities therefore required prior authorization.

In the second case, Chyron Corporation, a Melville, New York-based supplier of broadcast graphics hardware, software and services, agreed to pay a $15,300 civil penalty to settle charges that it knowingly exported an animation system to the Indian Space Research Organization's (ISRO) Space Applications Center in Ahmedabad, India, in violation of the EAR. BIS charged that Chyron exported the animation system to the ISRO Space Applications Center without a license, even though the ISRO Space Applications Center was on BIS's Entity List. BIS also charged that Chyron made a misrepresentation on the Shipper's Export Declaration when submitting the required shipping documents.


Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger