International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | Coalition Seeking Extension of Deadline to Submit ... » | Customs Reminds Brokers to Validate Identify and A... » | House International Relations Subcommittee to Hold... » | USTR Announces Procedures for 2005 GSP Annual Review » | House Trade Subcommittee to Hold Hearing on Future... » | U.S. Sanctions on Syria Renewed for One More Year » | Next NCITD Meeting to be Held on May 12, 2005 » | Shell and BASF Formally Announce Sale of Basell » | Sale of Basell To Iran's NPC Now Appearing Unlikely » | U.S. to Provide Information to Thailand in InVisio... » 

May 11, 2005 

Commerce Department Issues Clarification Regarding AD/CVD Filing Deadlines

The U.S. Department of Commerce's (DOC) International Trade Administration yesterday published in the Federal Register an important clarification involving the statutory deadlines for adntidumping and countervailing duty administrative proceedings. The notice states that "where a statutory deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday, or any other day when the Department is closed, the Department will continue its longstanding practice of reaching our determination on the next business day."

This clarification was made in light of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's (CAFC) recent decision in Dofasco, Inc. v. United States, 390 F.3d 1370, 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2004). In Dofasco, DOC published its notice of opportunity to request an administrative review on August 1, 2003. The notice stated that an administrative review would be conducted pursuant to "requests received by the last day of August 2003." The last day of August 2003 was a Sunday and September 1, 2003, was Labor Day, a federal holiday. United States Steel Corporation (USSC) filed a request for administrative review of Dofasco's antidumping liability on September 2, 2003. Dofasco asked the DOC to rescind its administrative review on the basis that USSC's request was untimely, not having been filed "by the last day of August." DOC refused to rescind the administrative review, claiming that its regulations provide that "if the applicable time limit expires on a non-business day, [Commerce] will accept documents that are filed on the next business day." The CAFC disagreed with Dofasco and held that a request for an administrative review was timely filed as long as the filing is made on the next business day following a non-business day, even if that day falls in the following month.

DOC's clarification notice can be found at the following link:
a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20051800/
edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/E5-2234.htm


Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger