International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | BIS Announces Agenda for Update 2005 » | Florida Company Settles Charges Relating to Unlice... » | BIS Posts 300+ Comments on Proposed Deemed Export ... » | CBP Clarifies Bond Requirements for Special Catego... » | U.S. to Negotiate Broad Textile Agreement with China » | CBP Clarifies Scope of Reconciliation Test Procedure » | Commerce Department Seeking Comments on Proposed C... » | Canada Claims Victory After NAFTA Extraordinary Ch... » | Volcker Commission Alleges That Half of Companies ... » | BIS Announces Settlement of Three Enforcement Cases » 

August 16, 2005 

Portland Newspaper Describes Sentencing Hearing Involving Maine Biological Laboratories

The Portland Press published an excellent article describing the contentious sentencing hearing involving Maine Biological Laboratories, Inc. (MBL) and several of its employees for engaging in numerous import and export violations, including receiving an avian influenza virus smuggled from Saudi Arabia, mail fraud, violation of the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act, making false statements to the U.S. Government and violations of the Export Administration Act.

The article notes that during the sentencing hearing U.S. District Court Judge John Woodcock criticized the company's argument that a significant monetary penalty would force the company to be shut down by stating "I find Maine Biological Laboratories' position here very troubling. . . . A good corporate citizen would accept the penalty, pay the fine and move on. Instead, Maine Biological Laboratories has . . . raised the specter of terrible economic suffering and trouble for its innocent employees." The article notes that MBL faced a fine ranging between $560,000 and $1.1 million and that federal prosecutors suggested a penalty of $500,000, the amount that the judge imposed on the company.

The article also contains a timeline describing the events that led to the imposition of the fines on the company and jail time for several of the company's executives and employees.


Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger