International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | BIS to Decommission SNAP in Early 2007 » | U.S. Suspends Deliveries and Sales of Military Equ... » | DDTC Will No Longer Accept Most Paper Applications... » | ITC Votes to Continue Antidumping and Countervaili... » | Be Sure to Update Your DDTC Bookmark » | Seeking Comments on OFAC's TSRA Licensing Program » | ITC Issues Update on Changes to HTSUS » | U.S. to Prohibit Exports of iPods, Harleys and Oth... » | FinCEN Director Werner to Enter Private Sector » | ITC Announces Likely Delay in U.S. Implementation ... » 

December 19, 2006 

BIS Publishes China Rule Comments

Today the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published on its website the public comments submitted on the proposed rule on export and reexport controls for the People's Republic of China (commonly, but incorrectly, referred to as the "China Catch-All Rule"). BIS received 55 comments from a wide variety of individuals, companies, associations and organizations. The comments, which run more than 900 pages in length, can be found at the following link: efoia.bis.doc.gov. Be careful when opening and viewing the file in your browser, as the PDF file is very large (approximately 77 MB).

Not surprisingly, most of the comments were critical of many aspects of the proposed rule. A large number of commenters stated that many products included in the 47 ECCNs that would be prohibited from being sold to military end-users in China are readily available in the global marketplace. In fact, many of the commenters provided specific information on products falling within the 47 ECCNs that are currently produced in or available in China (be sure to see the Cross Sector Report of the American Chamber of Commerce-PRC at page 109 of the PDF file). Many of the comments expressed skepticism on the utility of the Validated End-User Authorization and the problems associated with obtaining PRC End-User Certificates from MOFCOM.

It appears, however, that the large number of critical comments from industry are unlikely to cause BIS to withdraw the proposed rule. In a recent speech to the Washington International Trade Association, Christopher A. Padilla, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Administration, stated that BIS will "carefully review and consider the comments we received, and the reaction of our European and Asian allies, and factor all of this into our decisions on how to finalize and implement our new export control policies for China." While Assistant Secretary Padilla mentioned that "there may be some changes to the original proposal" he categorically stated that "scrapping the rule is simply not in the cards." He noted that:

Our proposed rule on China export controls derives from very fundamental tenets of U.S. foreign policy. For more than three decades across seven presidential administrations, the United States has sought to encourage legitimate civilian trade with China. That remains our policy, and the China rule will have the effect of helping to facilitate and streamline legitimate civilian exports, even as we prudently hedge against the rapid, double-digit growth in China’s military capabilities.

He also stated that BIS does "not believe the new rule imposes an unbearable burden on business" and mentioned that the VEU program "will liberalize more U.S. exports than the military end-use controls will prohibit."

While no specific timetable has been announced for issuing the final rule, BIS officials anticipate that the final rule will be issued some time in 2007.

Labels: ,


Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger