International Trade Law News /title <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <meta name="verify-v1" content="6kFGcaEvnPNJ6heBYemQKQasNtyHRZrl1qGh38P0b6M=" /> <head> <title>International Trade Law News

« Home | President's Export Council to Meet on May 25, 2005 » | Commerce Department Issues Clarification Regarding... » | Coalition Seeking Extension of Deadline to Submit ... » | Customs Reminds Brokers to Validate Identify and A... » | House International Relations Subcommittee to Hold... » | USTR Announces Procedures for 2005 GSP Annual Review » | House Trade Subcommittee to Hold Hearing on Future... » | U.S. Sanctions on Syria Renewed for One More Year » | Next NCITD Meeting to be Held on May 12, 2005 » | Shell and BASF Formally Announce Sale of Basell » 

May 11, 2005 

BIS Imposes $904,500 Fine on EMD Biosciences for Unlicensed Exports to Canada

The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) announced today that EMD Biosciences, Inc. (EMD) of San Diego, California, has agreed to pay a $904,500 civil penalty to settle charges that it exported biological toxins to Canada in violation of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). This penalty is one of the largest civil penalties imposed by BIS. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, EMD's export privileges under the EAR were denied for a period of two years, all of which is suspended provided that EMD commits no violations of the EAR during the next two years.

In its charging letter, BIS alleged that, between June 2002 and July 2003, EMD committed 134 violations of the EAR stemming from 67 exports of biological toxins to Canada that were made without obtaining required BIS export licenses.

EMD, formerly known as CN Biosciences, Inc. (CN), previously paid civil fines for unlicensed exports of the same and similar toxins. In 1999 CN agreed to pay a civil penalty of $708,000 to the Commerce Department to settle charges that between July 1992 and January 1994, CN made 171 unlicensed shipments to various destinations in violation of the EAR. $354,000 of the civil penalty was suspended for one year provided that the company committed no further violations of the EAR during that time.


Editor

Subscribe

Subscribe to our confidential mailing list

Mobile Version

Search Trade Law News

International Trade and Compliance Jobs

Jobs from Indeed

Archives

Categories

Disclaimer

  • This Site is presented for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed when you use this Site. Do not consider the Site to be a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. The information on this Site may be changed without notice and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct or up-to-date. While we try to revise this Site on a regular basis, it may not reflect the most current legal developments. The opinions expressed on this Site are the opinions of the individual author.
  • The content on this Site may be reproduced and/or distributed in whole or in part, provided that its source is indicated as "International Trade Law News, www.tradelawnews.com".
  • ©2003-2015. All rights reserved.

Translate This Site


Powered by Blogger